<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing after the watershed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.themarketingpractice.com/marketing-mit/marketing-after-the-watershed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.themarketingpractice.com/marketing-mit/marketing-after-the-watershed</link>
	<description>10 years, 10,000 campaigns: B2B marketing strategies that really drive sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David van Schaick</title>
		<link>http://blog.themarketingpractice.com/marketing-mit/marketing-after-the-watershed/comment-page-1#comment-3661</link>
		<dc:creator>David van Schaick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themarketingpractice.com/?p=902#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>Very interesting - look forward to the articles. 

I am wondering whether you will conclude that there really is much that is fundamentally new, or whether it is more a case that the economic challenges have created greater vigour for true marketing principles and a reduced tolerance of lazy or ineffectual marketing habit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting &#8211; look forward to the articles. </p>
<p>I am wondering whether you will conclude that there really is much that is fundamentally new, or whether it is more a case that the economic challenges have created greater vigour for true marketing principles and a reduced tolerance of lazy or ineffectual marketing habit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

